Conscientious objector: US Navy nurse refuses to force-feed Guantanamo detainee

The unidentified nurse – described by one inmate as a 40-year-old Latino – is believed to be the first conscientious objector to Guantanamo’s controversial tube feeding policy.

The news comes as US District Judge Gladys Kessler prepares to hear complaints regarding force-feeding from prisoners who object to the procedure on humanitarian grounds and believe it to be torture.

According to the Miami Herald, it first learned of the development from attorney Cori Crider, who represents Guantanamo inmate and frequent hunger striker Abu Wa’el Dhiab. In a phone call with Crider, the 43-year-old Syrian national said that after a couple of months on the job, a male Navy nurse refused to force-feed hunger-striking inmates sometime before the Fourth of July. Once the nurse made his decision, he was reportedly moved to other duties.

“Initially, he did carry out his orders and participate in the tube feedings,” Crider said Dhiab told her on the phone. “Once he saw with his own eyes that what he was told was contrary to what was actually taking place here, he decided he could not do it anymore.”

As quoted by Dhiab, the nurse declared, “I have come to the decision that I refuse to participate in this criminal act.”

As RT reported previously, Dhiab – who can’t be repatriated due to the conflict in Syria – has petitioned the US District Court seeking to either halt force-feeding or ensure that it’s done in a “civilized” manner. Previously, Judge Kessler acknowledged that the procedure could cause significant and unnecessary pain and agreed to halt Dhiab’s force-feeding. She quickly reinstated it, however, on the grounds that “the Court simply cannot let Mr. Dhiab die” due to his deteriorating medical condition.

 

In other cases, Guantanamo inmates have also objected to force-feeding by saying it causes unnecessary pain. Pakistani inmate Mohammad Ahmad Ghulam Rabbani claimed in May that unsuccessful attempts to feed him through tubes caused him to lose consciousness twice, face difficulty breathing, and vomit blood multiple times.

Regarding the Navy’s recent dissenter, Dhiab reportedly told his lawyer that the nurse gradually came to his decision but was always more lenient with inmates on hunger strikes than others were. The strikes have been on and off for the last 18 months.

“Here, whenever a person has a fever or is sick, the typical force-feeding crew were still very rough with you,” Crider quoted Dhiab. “However, when he came to the block and saw that the person had a fever or was sick, he would say, ‘OK, because you are sick, you are not able to receive force-feeding’ and left them alone for that day.”

Speaking with the Herald, Navy Capt. Tom Gresback declined to give out many details on the case, but he did confirm it occurred. He did not reveal how many inmates were currently engaged in hunger strikes or being fed via tubes.

“There was a recent instance of a medical provider not willing to carry out the enteral feeding of a detainee,” he wrote in an email. “The matter is in the hands of the individual’s leadership.”

Meanwhile, Army Col. Greg Julian said the nurse who refused to carry out the force feedings would not be allowed to speak with the press.