10 times the US contradicted its own rhetoric on peace and justice

especiales

10 times the US contradicted its own rhetoric on peace and justice
By: 
Fecha de publicación: 
21 November 2024
0
Imagen principal: 

The United States frequently portrays itself as a global champion of peace, democracy, and human rights. Yet its actions at the United Nations – and elsewhere – often tell a different story.

On Wednesday, the US vetoed a UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution calling for an "immediate, unconditional, and permanent" ceasefire in Gaza and measures to prevent the starvation of Palestinians. Despite 14 members voting in favour, Washington single-handedly blocked the resolution, stating it "could not support an unconditional ceasefire".

This marks the fourth such veto by the US since the onset of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023. Additionally, the US has vetoed at least 58 resolutions critical of Israel or condemning its violence against Palestinians since 1972, according to UN data.

The Gaza veto is just one of many instances where American interests have overruled the international community's collective will.

Here, we explore 10 historical examples of the US wielding its veto power to block resolutions aimed at fostering peace or holding nations accountable, exposing a troubling pattern.

1. Blocking condemnation of the bombing of Libya (1986)

In April 1986, the US launched air strikes on Tripoli and Benghazi in response to alleged Libyan involvement in a terrorist attack on a Berlin nightclub. These strikes resulted in civilian deaths and widespread international outrage.

A UNSC resolution condemning the attack as a violation of international law was introduced but vetoed by the US, which claimed the strikes were an act of “self-defence”.

2. Shielding Israel during the Lebanon War (2006)

During the 2006 Lebanon War, Israel launched a military campaign in southern Lebanon, causing extensive civilian casualties and destruction. A draft UN resolution called for an immediate ceasefire and condemned the targeting of civilians.

The US vetoed the resolution, claiming it would undermine “Israel’s ability to respond” to Hezbollah.

3. Opposing sanctions on apartheid South Africa (1970s-1980s)

During the apartheid era, the UN introduced multiple resolutions calling for economic sanctions against South Africa to pressure its government to end racial segregation and systemic oppression.

The US repeatedly vetoed these resolutions, citing concerns about the economic impact on both South African and American businesses operating there, further delaying international efforts to dismantle the oppressive regime.

4. Blocking condemnation of US actions in Nicaragua (1980s)

Throughout the 1980s, the US provided military and financial support to the Contra rebels in Nicaragua, who were fighting the socialist Sandinista government.

The conflict caused widespread civilian suffering and was condemned as a violation of Nicaragua's sovereignty. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) later ruled that US actions violated international law.

Multiple UN resolutions sought to condemn the US for its role in fueling the conflict and violating Nicaragua’s territorial integrity. The US vetoed these resolutions, fueling a devastating conflict while undermining global norms.

UNGA 79: 'Leaving no one behind' theme rings hollow amid Gaza genocide

5. Opposing criticism of the invasion of Panama (1989)

In December 1989, the US invaded Panama, claiming it sought to protect American citizens and restore democracy. However, many countries viewed the invasion as a violation of Panama’s sovereignty.

When the UNSC introduced a resolution condemning the invasion, the US vetoed it, arguing that its actions were necessary for regional stability and democracy, justifying its own actions under the guise of promoting democracy.

6. Supporting Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights (1981)

In 1981, Israel unilaterally annexed the Golan Heights, territory seized from Syria during the 1967 Six-Day War. The move violated international law, as UN resolutions prohibit the acquisition of territory by force.

The UNSC introduced a resolution declaring Israel’s annexation "null and void". The US vetoed it, claiming it would “complicate the peace process in the region”.

7. Blocking ceasefire efforts after Vietnam War (1960s-1970s)

The Vietnam War, which lasted from 1955 to 1975, was one of the deadliest conflicts of the 20th century. The US escalated its involvement in the 1960s, citing the need to stop the spread of communism. International calls for a ceasefire grew as civilian casualties mounted.

Throughout the conflict, the US opposed the UN resolutions aimed at the admission of Vietnam to the UN, further blocking peace efforts.

8. Opposing investigations into Iraq War (2003)

In 2003, the US led a coalition to invade Iraq, citing the presence of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and the need to remove Saddam Hussein from power. No WMDs were ever found, and the war led to massive civilian casualties and regional destabilisation.

The UN introduced efforts to investigate the legality of the war and its humanitarian consequences, but the US blocked such initiatives, insisting that its actions were justified under the doctrine of preemptive self-defence.

9. Blocking resolutions on Gaza blockade (2010)

Following the Israeli assault on a humanitarian flotilla attempting to deliver aid to Gaza, international outrage grew over Tel Aviv’s blockade, which was a violation of international law. The blockade severely restricted the movement of goods and people, worsening humanitarian conditions in Gaza.

The UN introduced a resolution condemning the blockade and calling for its immediate end. The US vetoed the resolution, arguing it “failed to address security concerns”.

10. Supporting Israel’s occupation of West Bank (1967-Present)

Since the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel has occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, territories internationally recognised as part of Palestine.

The UN has consistently called for Israel to withdraw from these territories, as their occupation violates international law, particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention.

However, the US has consistently shielded Israel from international criticism, often using its veto power to block resolutions critical of Israel’s actions.

Read More

UNSC’s veto power: A long-standing obstacle to accountability and reform

Alarming pattern

From shielding allies to justifying its own military actions, the US has repeatedly prioritised strategic alliances and economic gains over global peace and accountability.

Each veto has had consequences, prolonging wars, delaying justice, and eroding trust in international institutions.

The latest veto of the Gaza ceasefire adds to the US' troubling legacy, making it clear who is complicit in the suffering of millions.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.